Paula White and Jerry Falwell Jr. are great examples of why candidate endorsing churches should be taxed. These are mini cults preying on the weak, violating separation of church and state.
I have no issue with issue endorsing, but candidate endorsing crosses the line.
Anyone remember Benghazi? Republicans held 33 hearings on the attack on Benghazi and came up empty handed.
Republicans made no secret of the fact that the Benghazi hearings if nothing else, would put a stain on Hillary Clinton’s white house bid. The real purpose of the hearings was even confirmed publibly by republican leadership at the time. And it didn’t stop there either as republicans were only too happy to be faux outraged over the handling of classified information and Hillary’s e-mail server.
Vanity Fair published an article in May that the democratic strategy is to “Benghazi” Trump. That is to say, hold high profile hearings in long succession to uncover dirty laundry for the world to see.
It’s working.
Democrats would be only too happy to compare laundry baskets with the Trump administration. Game on.
There is going to be a lively debate about what constitutes an impeachable offense and what does not. In the meantime, week after week of hearings exposing just how corrupt this administration is promises to be an entertaining reminder that what goes around comes around.
The Benghazi-ing of Trump brings with it more risk to the entire republican party however. Democrats may lose the impeachment battle, but they are playing the long game here. If senate seats go blue in the fallout, dems ultimately win this game. The plan appears to be to not only expose Trump’s dirty underwear, but to publicly humiliate every republican senator who claims the stains on the underwear are due to shadows from faulty lighting when the images in exhibit A were taken.
Sucks to be held accountable.
It’s probably way too early to be speculating on anything to do with the democratic primaries. At this point all we have is the media’s rankings which is mostly based on fund raising success or lack thereof.
Not long ago I was leaning hard towards Kamala Harris. The original reasons that attracted me to her candidacy still exist. She’s smart. She’s tough. She’s kind and very likable, and perhaps best of all, she’s not at risk of being an octogenarian during her first term. Sure, go ahead and accuse me of agism. See if I care. I really don’t at this point.
As time goes on, the more I see of Mayor Pete, the more I like the idea of his candidacy. Here are my reasons.
At this point I can’t get excited about Sanders, Warren, or Biden. I would support them in a heartbeat over any republican of course but Pete Buttigeig would be a complete breath of fresh air into our political system. The voter turnout for young people would be off the charts. After all, it’s going to be their country 20 years from now, no? Someone from their generation should be guiding the direction of it. Especially now with critical climate decisions in the equation.
I only mention this because I like the idea of being an early adopter. It’s kind of like investing. Everyone knows Amazon is a great stock now, but the ones who bought at $50/share are the visionaries.
Count me in the Pete Buttigeig camp fairly early. The chance that he gets the nomination are probably pretty slim, but not if people keep an open mind.
That’s what did the democrats in the last time. Wasserman-Shultz declared Clinton the heir to the thrown before the primaries even got off the ground. Let’s hope that doesn’t happen this time.
Chuck Todd had a political analyst from Iowa on Meet The Press last Sunday. To be sure there were some interesting stats about what the people from the great state of Iowa were concerned about. My question is: Who gives a shit what Iowans think? It’s 6 bloody electoral votes. Iowa isn’t the “pulse” of the American heartland. It’s a small state out in the middle of nowhere with a bunch of farms and a few universities.
I’d like to believe that we live in a county where “diversity of opinions” is a good thing. I really would like to believe that. But I cannot.
With the onset of the Great Recession we saw the origins of the Tea Party movement, ostensibly a group of conservatives who were very concerned about our national debt, the budget deficit and government spending. They were successful at handcuffing then speaker Paul Ryan from negotiating any progress with progressives in the house. With a republican majority and speaker, it was all but guaranteed nothing would get done. Week after week they would appear on the Sunday News shows and express their outrage over government spending!
The problem for the Tea Party now is that they appear to have selective outrage. When a republican holds the White House, subsidies for farmers is suddenly okay. The vote for massive tax cuts for the wealthy on the promise that they will pay for themselves with a booming economy.
The problem is twofold. 1) The promise of the tax cuts paying for themselves was a lie and they knew it, and 2) Republicans suck at math.
Debt and deficits have grown at worse rates under republican leadership since Ronald Reagan introduced his infamous Trickle Down theory. Tax rates for the ultra wealthy went from 70% down to 39% and with capital gains at 15%, what we’re seeing is the upper tier pays less in percentage (~23%) than their hired help does.
Today they are fully trained in the New Gingrich mold of switching the conversation to “entitlements” as the root cause. The problem here is, social security isn’t an entitlement. We paid into that program and are owed the money.
No, the problem is that corporations and the wealthy haven’t been paying their fair share. 70% down to 23%. Do the math.
But they are the job creators comes the rallying cry from the peanut gallery! Bullshit. The lessons of the past 4 decades have told a different story. They haven’t created living wage jobs. If anything they have outsourced more.
And now with a Republican holding the White House and record deficits, the Tea Party is conspicuously absent from the conversation about debt and deficits. In fact, they vote in block to expand the very thing they were reportedly enraged about: big government spending.
I can only draw one conclusion from this: Tea Party Republicans are full of shit.
The WSJ says small family farms may not make it much longer. Despite the republican bailout (twice the size of the Obama bailout that wasn’t necessary in the first place because this is a self inflicted tariff wound), farmers will be lacking a critical piece of their business: markets.
If you’re a small farmer, lose your land and STILL vote republican, my sympathy level is low.
About my sophomore year in high school, I had developed a pretty bad attidude. I don’t remember exactly why I was so negative but I do remember the mindset of being anti-establishment on any/every issue whether it made sense or not, and the ultimate goal was to get away with being as lazy as possible. Then I got a lecture from Mr. Cramer.
Actually it wasn’t just me that got the lecture, it was the whole class, but it was because of a lame comment I had made in class – something to the effect of “what’s the point of doing this?”
Mr. Cramer was just trying to teach Algebra II and I was getting in his way a little bit. What happened next is something I’ve remembered for over 40 years, so he must have felt this was the time to seize the opportunity.
We were only about 5 minutes into a 45 minute class when I shared my unwelcome question. I remember Cramer then stopped writing on the board and turned around and said “Well, let’s talk about that.” From that point on there was no math lesson that day, just talk, mostly him. He pulled up a stool and abandoned the chalk board.
In a very calm manner he talked about attitudes that lead to success in life. How he was coaching his own kids along these lines. What he said was basically, put your mind in this place. Think about doing what you’re asked to do plus a little extra. People are impressed by that. If your mom asks you to take out the garbage, take out the garbage and sweep the patio. If your dad is expecting you to mow the lawn by Saturday, mow it by Thursday and pull a few weeds too. Do a little more than asked.
He spent the next 40 minutes ditching his entire lesson to talk about life and attitude and what will get you ahead vs. what will not. And he did it in such a calm manner that was basically a discussion with us. He didn’t preach. I was captivated and probably a little embarrassed in the moment, but I always remembered that he seized that moment and felt it was a good use of time to get our minds straight at the expense of a day’s lesson. In retrospect, that was pretty visionary of him because I remember nothing else about that class. Just that one day when he was willing to reach out and try to touch our mindset and appeal to our inner good. He was also intelligent enough to know that if he had yelled or taken a different approach to the discussion he would have lost me.
I not only remember that ‘lecture’ that day, I’ve tried very hard to apply it to my own life throughout the years. I can site several examples where it has helped me tremendously at work and set me apart from peers.
Thank you Mr. Cramer. That was one great math lesson.
First, I’d like to differentiate between republicans who may have voted for Trump vs. members of the Trump cult. There is a difference. That latter group, despite 3 years of hard evidence of corruption, incompetence, racism, misogyny, and lies that are demonstrably false on a daily basis, continue to support him. It’s Bhagwan-esque.
I have several friends in the first group and we clearly disagree but remain friends. The Trump cult members however, are beyond any kind of redemption. Nothing gets through. He literally could shoot someone on 5th Ave. and they would continue to support him because that’s what cult members do.
The one and only way to deal with cult members is a total shun. It gave me great pleasure to read about Alan Dershowitz complaining “I can’t go to parties anymore. Nobody will talk to me!” Right, Alan. You’re being shunned. And it’s well deserved.
This is my strategy moving forward. I recently unfriended a Trump cultist on Facebook for the offense of being a Trump cultist. When it comes to social media, for me it’s quality not quantity. Nothing sends the message better than telling someone to go affiliate with their other cult members and GTFO.
@chrislhayes
Look, if the president says it’s 72 degrees and sunny out then it’s 72 degrees and sunny out! That’s just how it is! It’s in the constitution. Look it up. #MAGA
View from my PDX Window 